Wednesday, March 30, 2011

March 29, 2011 Beck: Who Stands With Israel? | Glenn Beck

  • March 29, 2011

    This is a rush transcript from "Glenn Beck," March 29, 2011. This copy may not be in its final form and may be updated.

    GLENN BECK, HOST: Hello, America.

    A lot to do today -- I have never ever called for an opposing voice to be silenced. Not even Usama bin Laden. I believe it is better to have debate in the light of day. At least people can make an informed decision and it -- by challenging people, it makes people stronger.

    We can disagree. But it doesn't seem so anymore in America. Have the debate. Others cower.

    Right now, Soros and his billions of dollars are mounting what they describe as a guerilla war and sabotage on all of FOX News -- that's a quote -- and, of course, this program. I guess we're -- quoting them again -- "dangerous."

    Let me ask you, who is more dangerous to a free republic -- the one that supports open debate or the one that disguises himself, calls it an open society while trying to silence all debate?

    Of course, George Soros doesn't want my voice on the air. Of course, he wants you to sit down as well. Of course, he turns down our invite to be on the show, claiming that he would just be made to look like a foolish old man by me, which is -- couldn't be further from the truth.

    The only thing that would make Soros look foolish is his ideas spoken clearly out in the open, ideas that are wildly out of step with the American people, and I do believe becoming dangerous -- which is why he has to keep them in disguise. He has put together one serious operation. It's a serious operation that is on the wrong side of history.

    For example, do you know about the Soros-funded International Crisis Group? Look up the International Crisis Group. It is -- oh, it's quite amazing. And it seems to be right in the center of almost everything that is happening overseas, especially in Libya now and Egypt.

    International Crisis Group has consistently worked to support the group in the Middle East who want to establish an Islamic government, including the Muslim Brotherhood and even al Qaeda. There is a report that came out in June 2008, it's this one. It's entitled "Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood: Confrontation or Integration?"

    Guess what they decided would be best? It was put out by his group, the International Crisis Group -- who I believe he sits on the board and so did, so did ElBaradei for a while. Well, he resigned as soon as he got that call. Hmm.

    The report calls on Egypt's government and calls a crackdown of Egypt's government back then -- the crackdown on the Muslim Brotherhood as, quote, "dangerously short-sighted," adding, "the regime should take preliminary steps to normalize the Muslim Brotherhood's participation in political life." Oh, had Mubarak only listened, had he only listened.

    Now, while Soros' group advocates for these radical groups, he then singles out Israel, calling them, I'm quoting, "the main stumbling block" to the transformation of the Middle East. He added in this report, "In reality, Israel has much to gain from the spread of democracy in the Middle East, as the United States has. But Israel is unlikely to recognize its own best interest, because the change is too sudden and carries too many risks."

    Isn't it good to have a grandpa or a great-great-great grandpa that will just take us all by the hand and just fix all of our problems because we're just too young or dumb to understand?

    Remember, George Soros says Israel is the main problem in the Middle East to transformation. Too scary for them.

    George Soros is also the guy that believes that this, quoting him, "The main obstacle to a stable and just world order is the United States." Whoa!

    So, let's see if we have this right. Israel and the U.S. is an obstacle to what he and his groups believe should happen. Huh! You know who else thinks that? Osama bin Laden. Oh, I know, how about like Iran?

    Wait, we didn't stand up for people of Iran. That's a weird coincidence. It's almost like Iran, remember? They say we're the "Great Satan" and Israel is the little Satan and they're just using Satan while he's using obstacles. See?

    Now, what about Iran? Well, Iran -- they're a little different. They're spookier than even spooky dude. They want to wipe Israel off the map and they just produced a video saying that the Islamic messiah is on his way soon. Good, the messiah is coming? No. It's like it's opposite day reading "The Book of Revelation." Got it?

    How about the Muslim Brotherhood? The leaders who are openly talking about starting a war with Israel. I thought that they should be brought in the political fold.

    I want to pretend here for just a moment that the news is just a bunch of completely spontaneous unrelated events. No one is orchestrating anything! And that George Soros wants all the countries of the world to have a Jeffersonian Constitution and that there's is nobody on the planet that believes in the 12th Imam or the Mahdi that's going to behead all the unbelievers planet-wide. Or that the administration, let's blend -- let's pretend the administration hearts Israel, OK? And every child in every high school is as talented as all of the kids at that high school on "Glee."

    Now, with that in mind, let's look at the direction in the Middle East. Do you think it's headed toward, toward peaceful conclusion, to a happier world? Do you think it's going to end well or not so much? Are things happening that are beneficial to survival of Israel or not so much? Is there any leader in the world standing up for Israel or not so much?

    Yes, Bob, I'd have to go for not so much. Israel is under attack.

    And let me show you just a couple of things. OK. First of all, we have George Soros' powerful group and his players in the White House saying they're obstacles and also his players in the White House are pushing responsibility to protect that.

    But let's look here. Obama says that just last September, that we want a Palestinian state that it was possible within a year. Listen to this exactly.

    (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

    PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: When we come back here next year, we can have an agreement that will lead to a new member of the United Nations -- an independent, sovereign state of Palestine.

    (END VIDEO CLIP)

    BECK: When they meet, a year from that speech. So, a year from that speech would be September and 2011.

    Now, today we learn from an Israeli paper that an unnamed European diplomat has told them, quote, "International recognition of the Palestinian statehood appeared to be unavoidable in September." OK. So, September of 2011.

    Hamas is calling on the Arab League to stop Israel from exploiting regional instability to carry out massacres against Palestinians. Wait a minute. That one goes under the responsibility to protect -- which is this new George Soros/Cass Sunstein wife kind of thing. We'll get into that later. OK. Got it.

    Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas says he is willing to give up millions in U.S. aid to get just unity deal -- a unity deal with Hamas. Great. Great. OK. So, they're willing to negotiate.

    Reports this week also say that Abbas ordered lawmakers to complete a draft legislation for future state. So, in other words, draft the legislation to have an independent state within six months -- within six months that would be -- oh, yes, that would be the ninth month of this year.

    So, let's go with what else we know here. The U.N. is recognizing Palestinians as independent state. Yes. Yes. We got that one, too. Or this, or this, or this. All righty.

    Norwegian Socialist Party -- yes. Yes. They're calling for action now against Israel, military action. They're going to use responsibility to protect, I think.

    Muslim Brotherhood is now poised to grab power in Egypt and Libya. That's going to be great. They say that they're just ready to declare war against Israel.

    Oh, and one more thing that I'm sure is not a problem. Remember the president said last night that "I'm ready to turn it over to NATO. That's what I'm going to do because we've done our job." It's weird because just this morning -- I wonder if something happened overnight -- the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations -- wait for it, wait for it -- said, wait a minute, we're not going to turn it over to the NATO forces yet because we haven't decided if we're going to -- we haven't decided yet. I have no idea. Arm the rebels. No, no. Might, might not.

    That brings us to the "Responsibility to Protect" doctrine. This states that states have the right to protect the population. In fact, the responsibility to protect the populations from genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and ethic cleansing.

    This apparently is what was happening in Libya. That's what we use, justification to wage kinetic military action against a country that, as Defense Secretary Gates said, was not vital interest to the United States. But we had a responsibility to protect.

    And that was an idea spawned by none other than Samantha Power. She is a White House aide and the wife of the most dangerous man in America, Cass Sunstein. I'm thinking about calling them the most dangerous couple of the year because she's now out in the press bragging that it was Obama who triggered the Libya uprising. What? I'm sorry.

  • Power, before being in the White House, explicitly stated how she would deal with Israel. Here she is.

    (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

    SAMANTHA POWER, WHITE HOUSE AIDE: What we need is a willingness to actually put something on the line and sort of helping the situation. And putting something on the line might mean alienating a domestic constituency of tremendous political and financial import; it may more crucially mean sacrificing -- or investing, I think more than sacrificing -- literally billions of dollars not in servicing Israel's, you know, military, but actually investing in the new state of Palestine, in investing billions of dollars it would probably take also to support I think what will have to be a mammoth protection force.

    Intervention is going to come under fierce criticism. But we have to think about lesser evils, especially when the human stakes are just becoming ever more pronounced.

    (END VIDEO CLIP)

    BECK: Too high. That bad, bad Israel. The "Responsibility to Protect" doctrine, it worked in Libya. And they're going to try it again against Israel, because the stakes are just too high.

    Back in 2009, they've already -- you know, they tried this in 2009. It didn't go well for them. No. No. You know who tried this? The U.N. official Robert Falk, said Israel was guilty of war crimes. Not self- defense after they attacked Gaza.

    In the letter that he wrote, from an interview from the Institute for Policy Studies. Institute for Policy Studies -- that is another George Soros group. Wow! It's the same one that came up with another report, begging Obama to rule by executive order. It was great.

    When they asked the slightly leading question about the killing of 1,300 Palestinians, mostly women and children, and if it could have been stopped by the U.N., the answer was: a strong general assembly resolution would have set the stage for follow-up and forcible resolutions, possibly, including mechanisms for holding Israeli officials accountable. And an arms embargo, or even deploys a cease-fire enforcement or protection force, perhaps based on the assembly's own embrace of the doctrine known as the "Responsibility to Protect." Hmm.

    You know, a couple of years ago, we could laugh this off because these are just some kooky progressives that we didn't think anybody listened to. But they're the ones calling the shots and, boy, they have been busy while we were asleep.

    It's pretty obvious, if you want to look at the facts, where the next shot is heading. I've asked this on the show a few times lately. Where is Churchill? Where is Reagan? Where is Lincoln? Where is Washington? Where is anybody?

    We got Soros. We got him. We got the president. We seem to have socialists everywhere, Brazil, everywhere.

    Where is the person standing up for freedom? Where is the person on the national stage standing up for Israel? Do you see him? I mean, really standing up?

    We got Benjamin Netanyahu, but that's pretty obvious.

    Tonight, I'd like to add my small little voice and make a declaration as clear as humanly possible that I know what time it is. I've done my home work. I'm also a spiritual guy.

    God is not going to hold us unaccountable for what we do or do not do, for what we say or do not say. We must stand and be clear. I stand with Israel. And where is anyone else?

    Now, it doesn't mean you blindly support everything they do. But you stand with them.

    Now, I know the blogs, especially the Soros blogs who are hiring more and more interns every day, they're creating jobs -- they're going to call me a fraud or crazy man or anti-Semitic Jew lover. I don't know how that is possible but they've tried it.

    But I will stand. I don't know how long it's going to take for the world to right itself, but I at least know where right is. And that is where I will stand.

    Each of us have to ask ourselves, do you stand with the people in this dog fight over in the Middle East -- do you stand with the people that are the most like Americans? They make mistakes. They do.

    We do, too. We suck sometimes as a country. Most times we don't. But we're at least trying to do the right thing. And so is Israel.

    Or do you stand with those who are teaching to hide, blackmail, rewrite history -- people who are trying to destabilize and create fear? I mean, if that's -- if that's where you are, what's the difference between you and a terrorist? I would rather stand with the surviving members of the Fogel family.

    I would rather teach my children the lessons of that brutal murder that were taught by surviving members. I'd much rather teach my children about this family and these lessons, than the lessons of those who hand out cake in celebration of those who killed that family.

    Name the country in the Middle East that has the values generally speaking that we have. I can only name one. Why are we standing with all of those against Israel?

    They tolerated more provocations than probably any other country in history, and despite having enough arsenal of nukes to obliterate their enemies. Believe me, they can take care of themselves. How many have they lobbed? Answer, zero.

    While everyone complains about the evils that Israel has done to the Arabs and then picks apart each tiny imperfection with their democracy -- democracy, by the way, a republic is ugly -- tens of millions of Arabs, tens of millions have suffered atrocities at the hands of their own countries. Gays are still tortured today and killed, bloggers jailed without cause, women humiliated, raped and murdered, dissidents killed, protesters shot, terrorist born, suicide bombers given by their mothers.

    But Israel is the evil one? That's the obstacle to peace?

    Let me ask you this, how many homosexuals have been stoned to death by the Israelis? How many adulterers have been buried up to their neck in sand and stoned to death in Israel? How many bloggers have been jailed without cause? How many terrorists are wearing a yarmulke?

    But now, the world is being led to the water that Israel is the evil one. And it's about to drink. Don't drink that water.

    They have measurably -- I know it's the Middle East -- they have immeasurably more freedom than any other Middle Eastern nation. Women are free to drive. Women and our daughters can walk alone in the street without being stoned or jailed. You can bring a Bible or a Koran into Israel.

    A woman can't walk down the street alone and be safe. And not because she's in a dangerous neighborhood, but because she walked alone without a man? How do you possibly stand with that country? How do you possibly stand with a group of people that say I'm going to kill you if you don't go to my faith?

    A country that treats women or people who are at all different like a dog, treats a woman as a piece of furniture or a sexual toy that can be raped. The courts will allow it.

    How is it that a country like ours actually listens to those evil people saying this is evil? And we believe it. How many Israelis have taken someone off the streets and then beheaded them on videotape just for political reasons?

    Our administration is siding with the wrong side. They are standing against good and encouraging evil in the Middle East. We are reprimanding the nation that is as flawed as we are and protecting the aggressors. We are protecting the killers and the terrorists. We have gone from a nation who was doing the wrong thing by siding with Mubarak to a nation who is doing an even greater evil by arming al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood which empowers Iran and also in the end destroys Israel.

    It is not difficult to tell good apart from evil. Let's start with some simple ideas: voting rights. Generally speaking, which is better, voting rights of Iran, Muslim Brotherhood, those who run al Qaeda? How about free speech? Rights of women? Rights of homosexuals? America and Israel or the people we seem to be siding with?

    I stand tonight with Israel.

    Content and Programming Copyright 2011 Fox News Network, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Copyright 2011 CQ-Roll Call, Inc. All materials herein are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of CQ-Roll Call. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the content.

 
Carl Ray Louk

"FRIENDSHIP NEVER ENDS" SG-1996
"LET LOVE LEAD THE WAY" SG-2000
"THE PHOENIX SHALL RISE" SD
"EVEN A MAN WHO IS PURE IN HEART AND SAYS HIS PRAYERS BY NIGHT, MAY BECOME A WOLF WHEN THE WOLFBANE BLOOMS AND THE AUTUMN MOON IS BRIGHT." LT-1941
"FLESH OF MY FLESH; BLOOD OF MY BLOOD; KIN OF MY KIN WHEN SAY COME TO YOU, YOU SHALL CROSS LAND OR SEA TO DO MY BIDDING!" CVTD-1895
"FROM HELL'S HEART I STAB AT THEE, FOR HATE SAKE I SPIT MY LAST BREATH AT THEE" CA-1895 
"I HAVE BEEN, AND ALWAYS SHALL BE YOUR FRIEND" Spock 
"TRICK OR TREAT, TRICK OR TREAT CANDY IS DANDY BUT MURDER, OH MURDER, IS SO SWEET" CRL-2003 
"EYE OF NEWT, AND TOE OF FROG, WOOL OF BAT, AND TONGUE OF DOG ADDER'S FORK, BLIND-WORM'S STING, LIZARD'S LEG, AND OWLET'S WING. FOR A CHARM OF POWERFUL TROUBLE, LIKE A HELL-BROTH BOIL AND BABBLE. DOUBLE, DOUBLE, TOIL AND TROUBLE, FIRE BURN, AND CALDRON BUBBLE" WS

MySpace.com: www.myspace.com/carlraylouk
http://www.myspace.com/carlraylouk

Yahoo Group: Yahoo! Groups : LouksHauntedGraveyardhttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/LouksHauntedGraveyard/

Yahoo Group: Yahoo! Groups : TheWorldAccordingtoCarlRayLouk http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheWorldAccordingtoCarlRayLouk/

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home